Missing 3/4 asio on sb0060 solved?

mrvomit · Nov 6, 2005, 01:15 PM

I have that card (sb0060) and

for his "internal "probhlem th people explained me a year ago ,

It miss on KX asio 3 and 4 8asio panel).
that stopped me to use asio fully as i could ,i just use sometime.

I wonder if that behavior was solved on some
3538 release maybe?

Russ · Nov 6, 2005, 05:35 PM

All 10k1 based cards are missing 2 Asio channels (KX_FX2(0x1), KX_FX2(0x2): Asio 1/2 on epilog, Asio 3/4 on ProFx Asio). This is due to an issue with the Center/LFE channels with these cards. This has not changed with later kX releases.

Max M. · Nov 7, 2005, 05:01 AM

[color=gray](not "all" - only "5.1" series are affected (e.g. sb60, 100))[/color]

>that stopped me to use asio fully as i could

are you really talking about "14 ASIO channels are not enough"?

mrvomit · Nov 7, 2005, 12:36 PM

is sure enough .But since i have other problems:
I don't get to record usng ASIO (playback ok),so i thought is related .
Mme mode works also in record,using asio i don get to record ,

even connecting directly source src (to be recorded) to winmm recording output

Russ · Nov 7, 2005, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrvomit

is sure enough .But since i have other problems:
I don't get to record usng ASIO (playback ok),so i thought is related .
Mme mode works also in record,using asio i don get to record ,

even connecting directly source src (to be recorded) to winmm recording output

I am not sure what you mean. You do not use the WinMME recording connections for Asio recording. Connect directly to the Asio connections for Asio recording (and do not use Asio1/2 on epilog as they are not connected to anything). Aside from that, be aware of the Asio Mapping issue with some 10k1 cards (the numbers used in kX, may not match those used by your Asio host software, so you will have to figure out the mapping yourself). Aside from that it is just a matter of configuring your host software.

Tril · Nov 7, 2005, 04:13 PM

Quote:

All 10k1 based cards are missing 2 Asio channels (KX_IN(0x1), KX_IN(0x2): Asio 1/2 on epilog

Do those numbers (0x1, 0x2) correspond to asio1 and asio2 on epilog?

With my sblive, it's asio14 and asio15 that don't work with the default DSP. If the epilog and prolog are loaded in a different order (epilog then prolog or prolog then epilog, I don't remember) it's asio1 and asio2 that don't work.

Russ · Nov 7, 2005, 04:58 PM

Yes, they do correspond to ASIO1/2 on epilog. I think you are confusing the ASIO mapping issue, with the issue regarding the 2 unused ASIO connections. Look at the microcode source of epilog, and you will see that the ASIO1/2 connections (although included) do not do anything. With the ASIO mapping issue, they may show as being labeled differently in your host software, but in kX, it is ASIO1/2 on epilog (and ASIO3/4 on ProFx Asio (they are not included at all)... KX_FX2(0x1) and KX_FX2(0x2)).

BTW: That was a typo (which I corrected), it should read KX_FX2(0x1) and KX_FX2(0x2).

Russ · Nov 7, 2005, 05:11 PM

Here is the relevant code (epilog):

Code:

macints  KX_FX2(0x0),  0x0,  asio0,  0x4;
macints  KX_FX2(0x3),  0x0,  asio3,  0x4;
macints  KX_FX2(0x4),  0x0,  asio4,  0x4;
macints  KX_FX2(0x5),  0x0,  asio5,  0x4;
macints  KX_FX2(0x6),  0x0,  asio6,  0x4;
macints  KX_FX2(0x7),  0x0,  asio7,  0x4;
macints  KX_FX2(0x8),  0x0,  asio8,  0x4;
macints  KX_FX2(0x9),  0x0,  asio9,  0x4;
macints  KX_FX2(0xa),  0x0,  asio10,  0x4;
macints  KX_FX2(0xb),  0x0,  asio11,  0x4;
macints  KX_FX2(0xc),  0x0,  asio12,  0x4;
macints  KX_FX2(0xd),  0x0,  asio13,  0x4;
macints  KX_FX2(0xe),  0x0,  asio14,  0x4;
macints  KX_FX2(0xf),  0x0,  asio15,  0x4;

Note that KX_FX2(0x1) and KX_FX2(0x2) are not used, and the asio1 and asio2 inputs are also not used.