|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
|
Nov 22, 2006, 03:56 PM
|
#1
|
|
Burned
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 29,660
|
Which GFX control panel do you rate as the best?
Vote and discuss !
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2006, 05:54 PM
|
#2
|
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 155
|
LOL I can't say I am surprised at the results. We should all picket outside AMD and ATI's offices till we get the old CP back.
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2006, 07:15 PM
|
#3
|
|
Hopeless Dreamer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Dreamland, near the pool of infinite graphics cards
Posts: 1,753
|
IMO the CCC is in many senses an improvement over the old ATI control panel. The main problem I have with it is the waste of resources. Some tens of MB of RAM going down the drain here. It's not a major issue for me, but it's annoying. I prefer the old NVIDIA panel to the old ATI one. Haven't seen the new NVIDIA panel yet.
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2006, 08:02 PM
|
#4
|
|
DriverHeaven Addict
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Elysium
Posts: 328
|
I much preferred the old ATi to the new CCC. Agree with ET3D, it seems so sluggish to respond. I hate to have to make changes at all for anything anymore. The old one seemed to me equally effective and much faster.
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2006, 08:06 PM
|
#5
|
|
F.U.B.A.R.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 19,015
|
IMO, it's close between the old NVIDIA and old ATI control panels as to which one i like best. The new one on both though are garbage IMO.
I only use the CCC because i have to, and i'm sure that eventually it will be the same for the NVIDIA control panel, use it because i have to.
It would be nice if i could select two options in the vote box.
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2006, 10:34 PM
|
#6
|
|
S-3D enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,410
|
I never used any of the ATI control panels so I can't judge them.
I prefer the old NVIDIA control panel to the new one. The new one is slower to use and it's missing some settings (mainly the stereo drivers settings).
|
|
|
Nov 23, 2006, 12:10 AM
|
#7
|
|
watching 1080i
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: April 13th 2029
Posts: 19,432
|
I've used them all. Both new ones are horrible as far as I am concerned, but to me ATI's new one is much worse that NV's new one for a variety of reasons.
Both old ones are ok, but I like NV's old one better and I use it still.
|
|
|
Nov 23, 2006, 12:49 AM
|
#8
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2
|
i voted for old ati, but actually only use ATT ever since the first time i've installed it.
|
|
|
Nov 23, 2006, 04:04 AM
|
#9
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Viriginia
Posts: 554
|
I suppose "old is always better" I mean old cars, old bikes,but I cant complain about nV's new CP seems better to me than the CCC.
|
|
|
Nov 23, 2006, 06:26 AM
|
#10
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 1,396
|
I vote for ATI Tray Tools
I tried CCC (6.10) only once - uninstalled it five minutes later.
|
|
|
Nov 23, 2006, 11:09 AM
|
#11
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: around
Posts: 792
|
I voted for the simplest solution: old NV. I still use it. Old ATI was fine too, but it's a bit trickier to get to all the options.
Newer CPs all required a lot more mouse-clicks to do the same job...
|
|
|
Nov 23, 2006, 03:40 PM
|
#12
|
|
alpha male
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: offpiste
Posts: 5,498
|
i'm not a fan of all things old, but in this case the old cp was much better. but then i'm a minimalist
|
|
|
Nov 23, 2006, 03:45 PM
|
#13
|
|
DH News MOD
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Nottingham,UK
Posts: 32,658
|
My vote has to be for the 'Nvidia Old style'.
The reason being it was so easy to find the options most user require at hand.
The new Nvidia cp is way too confusing in my opinion.
|
|
|
Nov 23, 2006, 09:01 PM
|
#14
|
|
DriverHeaven Knight
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: EIRE{great for black stuff ,bulmers cider and Munster rubgy
Posts: 1,091
|
ati old
|
|
|
Nov 23, 2006, 09:44 PM
|
#15
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: S. Indiana
Posts: 519
|
I think it purley shows the way we all voted "dont fix something that isnt broke"
|
|
|
Nov 24, 2006, 01:10 AM
|
#16
|
|
DriverHeaven Addict
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hot as hell in summer
Posts: 285
|
ATI Old Style was my favourite
|
|
|
Nov 24, 2006, 02:43 AM
|
#17
|
|
Hopeless Dreamer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Dreamland, near the pool of infinite graphics cards
Posts: 1,753
|
There's one thing I really like about the CCC, and that's the 3D preview. It finally provides me an easy way to explain to people what the various settings do. Most people who have no idea what AA or AF are can understand what they do with this preview.
|
|
|
Nov 24, 2006, 03:57 AM
|
#18
|
|
DH Team Leader
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vantaa, Finland
Posts: 5,575
|
One more vote for ATi's old control panel 
|
|
|
Nov 24, 2006, 12:06 PM
|
#19
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 47
|
I rated for the old Ati panel. The new looks better but it is too slow. The new CCC with the performance of old panel, this would be the best.
|
|
|
Nov 24, 2006, 01:31 PM
|
#20
|
|
Elisha = hottie
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: USA CA. SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,327
|
I voted ATI old panel. The CCC at it current state is just bloatware IMHO. I'm still a little burnt over the mandatory .NET requirement. I prefer the simple approach to ATI TOOLS. All the settings can be adjusted on fly with the system tray icon if need be.
Can't comment on the Nvidia side due to switching to ATI for the last few upgrades. However.. after I pick up one more AGP board (X1950) I'll be going back to Nvidia when I switch to PCI-E and the Core Duo2.
|
|
|
Nov 24, 2006, 07:07 PM
|
#21
|
|
Xtreme
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, Can
Posts: 3,473
|
old ati definately. Then the old nvidia. Basic = better.
|
|
|
Nov 25, 2006, 01:04 PM
|
#22
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 883
|
Actually i like Ati Tray tools the best :P But I can say that old styles FTW! New ones suck.
|
|
|
Nov 26, 2006, 03:15 AM
|
#23
|
|
Simian Masterpiece!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London, Ont. Canada
Posts: 299
|
Nvidia old - still use it. 
|
|
|
Nov 26, 2006, 02:41 PM
|
#24
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,284
|
Deffo old ATI, clean simple and made sense, when are people going to realise that bells and whistles aren't always appropriate!
|
|
|
Nov 26, 2006, 10:29 PM
|
#25
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 71
|
A vote for Nvidia old style. i think the only way to use Ati's and Nvidia's new CP is getting 4 gigs of ram... WTF with the waste of resources, specially with CCC
Is ther an improvement of usign nwe nvidia control panel?
|
|
|
Nov 27, 2006, 07:58 AM
|
#26
|
|
Chilling... :)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 12,538
|
I wonder how many actually have tried the latest CCC versions? I hated the earlier verison, but tried 6.10 a week ago and find it pretty good actually.
|
|
|
Nov 28, 2006, 06:34 AM
|
#27
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 1,396
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erroneus
I wonder how many actually have tried the latest CCC versions? I hated the earlier verison, but tried 6.10 a week ago and find it pretty good actually.
|
I did. I had to install .NET framework anyway because of Visual Basic 2005.
And CCC compared to ATT is:
-slow
-takes much more HDD space
-takes much more memory
-offers nothing more than ATT (CCC has even less options to play with)
SO, I don't see any reason why should I use CCC.
|
|
|
Nov 28, 2006, 06:53 AM
|
#28
|
|
Hopeless Dreamer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Dreamland, near the pool of infinite graphics cards
Posts: 1,753
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyBatty
I did. I had to install .NET framework anyway because of Visual Basic 2005.
And CCC compared to ATT is:
-slow
-takes much more HDD space
-takes much more memory
-offers nothing more than ATT (CCC has even less options to play with)
SO, I don't see any reason why should I use CCC.
|
Complaining about HDD space is kind of silly, IMO. In these days when a single game can take 15GB or 20GB of your disk, a few tens of MB are really not much.
The RAM is the only thing that really bothers me, since RAM can still be at a premium, compared to HD space. The current CCC isn't horribly slow (just a tad), and far as I can see the CCC has more options than the control panel had, when it comes to video (the dual display video options are a b | |