|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
|
Aug 22, 2005, 08:14 AM
|
#1
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: great yarmouth uk
Posts: 1,090
|
Windows 64 questions???
im thinking about trying the windows 64 , is there any pefomance gain??is it possible to install any game on it??
Last edited by Rasta Monsta; Feb 16, 2006 at 03:47 PM.
|
|
|
Aug 22, 2005, 12:37 PM
|
#2
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 16,122
|
a small bost, but alot of stuff doesn't run includeing many copy protected games,
becouse the copy protection people havn't updated thier virtaul driver crap to 64bit yet.
|
|
|
Aug 22, 2005, 08:50 PM
|
#3
|
|
DH Administrator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 4,550
|
x64 is my main OS since it came out, I now run a x64/Vista install, with no XP 32 at all.
The only game I've had an issue with is SplinterCell CT.
I play BF2, GTA:SA and most other games on my machine without a problem. In terms of performance you probably won't notice the difference. But if you've got the hardware why not use it.
The more demand there is for x64 compatibility the quicker it will come.
Nearly all printer drivers are working now. ATI have full 64 support, with a x64 version of each catalyst being released same day as the normal sets.
Daemon Tools is another program that won't run. But with Apps like WinImage you don't need it anyway.
You've got nothing to loose.
|
|
|
Aug 23, 2005, 03:48 AM
|
#4
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: great yarmouth uk
Posts: 1,090
|
ok thanks for the reply guys, i`ll complete splintercell 3 and the try the free trial.i hope not to have problems with my other games(hl2,bf2,and fear when it comes out
|
|
|
Jan 4, 2006, 07:41 AM
|
#5
|
|
Code Geass Otaku.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Deptford,New Jersey
Posts: 1,089
|
i use x64 as my main os with a partition for another os but havent installed one...only game i have had a problem with is area 51....wont install kuz it says os not supported...not a big problem tho...
|
|
|
Jan 5, 2006, 10:29 PM
|
#6
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,202
|
daemontools came out with an x64 version
heres an install fix for area51
http://www.planetamd64.com/index.php?download=362
you should go for x64, like others said theres no big speed increase. i notice its much more stable then 32bit xp. i dont really remember the last time i had a crash 
|
|
|
Jan 6, 2006, 12:49 AM
|
#7
|
|
DH's Dormant Dragon
Join Date: May 2002
Location: IN Rem-Dormancy
Posts: 23,665
|
XP 64Bit has been my main OS for roughly a week not.... and i must say, the initial installation and so far use of it has been pretty solid and fast in comparison to an already fast windows XP 32bit i was previously running..
I WAS Going to install 32bit on a seperate partition, but i don't actually have an real reason. So far every benchmark, game i've thrown up has worked with absalutely no issues to mention.
|
|
|
Jan 6, 2006, 07:28 AM
|
#8
|
|
Code Geass Otaku.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Deptford,New Jersey
Posts: 1,089
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Judas
I WAS Going to install 32bit on a seperate partition, but i don't actually have an real reason. So far every benchmark, game i've thrown up has worked with absalutely no issues to mention.
|
thats what i did and yes i havent found a reason to use it yet lol
|
|
|
Jan 13, 2006, 01:57 PM
|
#9
|
|
The quest continues
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,432
|
Aquamark 3 wont run for me with XP x64 everything else is fine pretty much. Some USB devices are still lacking support, thr only game I have had issue with is GT Legends
|
|
|
Jan 13, 2006, 03:02 PM
|
#10
|
|
Code Geass Otaku.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Deptford,New Jersey
Posts: 1,089
|
area 51 wont install and i have to use ptp mode on my sony cyber shot
|
|
|
Jan 13, 2006, 08:06 PM
|
#11
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,202
|
i posted a link to the install fix for area51.
aquamark3 i think uses a 32bit driver.
|
|
|
Jan 24, 2006, 07:45 AM
|
#12
|
|
Code Geass Otaku.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Deptford,New Jersey
Posts: 1,089
|
oh and theres no x64 drivers for my ati tv wonder pro >< other then that its all good
|
|
|
Jan 25, 2006, 05:31 PM
|
#13
|
|
The quest continues
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,432
|
tv tuners seem to be dragging far behind for the x64 version. Even though ATI had a press release earlier this week saying they are leading the way in support for this OS
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2006, 08:03 AM
|
#14
|
|
DriverHeaven Addict
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 378
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chaos
tv tuners seem to be dragging far behind for the x64 version. Even though ATI had a press release earlier this week saying they are leading the way in support for this OS
|
ATI doesnt support the AIW series all that well with 32 bit sytems as evidenced in our own DH AIW forum....
But I really enjoy my computer with the OEM XP Pro x64. I am using a ULI chipset, 939 3200, X800 Pro (AGP), 2 x 512 PC3200. I do little outside the office suite except for MS flight Simulator 2004. It is hard to put it in to tangibles, but to me the x64 system seems butter smooth as opposed to Tabletop smooth, in other words it seems to be a little faster and a little more....compliant? Anyway I like it. I will get Vista after the initial rush.
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2006, 11:10 AM
|
#15
|
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 119
|
I did some digging and found out that the reason Windows XP 64 bit is so "smooth" as you say. It's based off the 64 bit version of Server 2003. I've even had a few programs report my OS as Windows Server Edition 2003.
My only hang up is the lack of driver support for my HP all-in-one.
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2006, 01:27 PM
|
#16
|
|
DriverHeaven Addict
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 378
|
Most of the manufacturers seem content to develop drivers only for new equipment. I have a problem with my HP P1000 too, it is a Legacy Item and HP doe not have x64 drivers for any of its current photo printers except the $400 dollar model. They are spotty on the deskjets too, but they do have a few. Canon is a little better as they have some of their lower end printers included. I have not checked Lexmark and I am not a Epson fan.
It would seem they just want to support future sales and let those already made wither in the wind.
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2006, 01:59 PM
|
#17
|
|
The quest continues
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,432
|
the site PlanetAMD64.com has lots of beta HP stuff for x64
|
|
|
Jan 29, 2006, 08:14 AM
|
#18
|
|
The quest continues
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,432
|
I have the HP DeskJet 3845 and use the beta available @ PlanetAMD64 without issues
|
|
|
Jan 29, 2006, 08:38 AM
|
#19
|
|
DriverHeaven Addict
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 378
|
I have looked there and saw quite a few I will down load one or two.
|
|
|
Jan 29, 2006, 08:44 AM
|
#20
|
|
The quest continues
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,432
|
the beta HP drivers are a 3 piece set, all 3 parts are required
|
|
|
Feb 12, 2006, 06:08 AM
|
#21
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3
|
I recently built the sys in my sig and decided to give x64 a shot ( it was only $120 @ newegg ) and I luv it.
Runs fast, smooth, stable and runs everthing I throw at it except Quicken 6 ( which I've had since win95 ) because it was 16bit
It even had the drivers for my HP 722c
The best part is that its familiar and all the tweaks ect. for XP work in x64.
PS Win loads in about 15 sec, but my FX55 might have something to do with that. 
|
|
|
Feb 14, 2006, 09:00 PM
|
#22
|
|
The quest continues
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,432
|
I also really like the 64bit OS, and the Catalyst support for X64 is right up to date with each new release
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2006, 04:50 PM
|
#23
|
|
DH's Dormant Dragon
Join Date: May 2002
Location: IN Rem-Dormancy
Posts: 23,665
|
still no drivers for alot of the printers and scanners i've seen yet... quite annoying...
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2006, 04:53 PM
|
#24
|
|
The quest continues
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,432
|
while there are not manyavailable they do seem to show up in beta Judas. Have a look around the download section of PlanetAMD64.com that's where I got HP drivers. You will have to register to havew access to their downloads though
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2006, 08:44 PM
|
#25
|
|
DriverHeaven Addict
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 378
|
planet AMD64 is a good site, i just don't like the Idea of generic beta drivers, I always think I am missing something rather than geting it all with a purpose built driver.
|
|
|
Feb 15, 2006, 11:23 PM
|
#26
|
|
Just an Average Joe...
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: On my way to live in Haiti or something
Posts: 1,598
|
These questions keep popping up. . .let's sticky these comments for a bit, for the people considering this OS.
rasta
|
|
|
Feb 18, 2006, 08:06 PM
|
#27
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,481
|
Sweet man all of a sudden x64 likes my computer, and is now working. I just wish my Sunbelt Kerio firewall worked with it.
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2006, 07:32 PM
|
# | |