Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zardon
decent bench for your system mike.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by joeb
I would like to see the effects of multiple disk systems. If you have your os/apps on your PATA system and data on the SATA system does that effect the results? If you had a benchmark that included paging what would the effects of seperating the scratch drive to a third subsystem? It may be that the current benchmark is not effected by these issues. KISS (keep it simple stupid) is the best policy. I may be asking for too many variables.
|
Well If you have enough memory, nothing is paged out, on a very low memory
system yes it'd have probubly an effect. Obviously have the scratch on anther
drive would be benifical. Especally since sich a system wuld be useing the system
page file freqently.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by joeb
I was suprised to see CS2 with better speed results. My impression was that CS2 was slower than CS. One reason I have not upgraded was this speed issue. Do the actions in the benchmark benifit from the CS2 upgrade more than most?
|
For one I understand CS2 supports
multi-threading and takes advatage
of some things CS1 doesn't , but then again I'm a little fuzzy on the topic