|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
Jun 28, 2005, 07:27 PM
|
#1
|
|
F.U.B.A.R.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 19,015
|
PCmark05 now available!!
PCmark05 is now available for download. You can get it from Futuremark here.
|
|
|
Jun 29, 2005, 06:10 AM
|
#2
|
|
F.U.B.A.R.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 19,015
|
11hrs. later, i'm finally home at my PC, d/ling this madnes 
|
|
|
Jun 29, 2005, 06:43 AM
|
#3
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Infinity
Posts: 3,682
|
Im not gunna even bother with this, 04 raped my system...
|
|
|
Jun 29, 2005, 07:14 AM
|
#4
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 16,122
|
3,855 on a 3400+ 754 with a X800XL and a gig of ram...
tests some strange stuff LOL
|
|
|
Jun 29, 2005, 09:55 AM
|
#5
|
|
DriverHeaven Addict
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 378
|
PCmark's not my strong point in benchmark. I got about 1000 points lower than my pcmark04 score. At least the tests were better to watch than pcmark04.
|
|
|
Jun 29, 2005, 12:35 PM
|
#6
|
|
F.U.B.A.R.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 19,015
|
my system did pretty well. I got 4,453pts @ stock speeds. I think my system would do better if my HDDs were defragmented
|
|
|
Jul 11, 2005, 01:34 AM
|
#7
|
|
confutatis maledictis
Join Date: May 2002
Location: somewhere dark
Posts: 5,952
|
Interesting... differences between in Windows XP: SP2 vs. x64
x64 is light, sp2 dark (x64 was 100 points higher in overall score)
|
|
|
Jul 24, 2005, 03:14 PM
|
#8
|
|
Just an Average Joe...
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: On my way to live in Haiti or something
Posts: 1,598
|
|
|
|
Jul 24, 2005, 05:01 PM
|
#9
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,501
|
3800 
|
|
|
Jul 24, 2005, 09:08 PM
|
#10
|
|
Delete Me
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,676
|
looks like dual channel, and dual core is the way to go for the year then 
|
|
|
Jul 24, 2005, 09:16 PM
|
#11
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: norcal
Posts: 5,800
|
you guys know this came out a month ago?
|
|
|
Jul 25, 2005, 01:00 AM
|
#12
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 16,122
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vampyromaniac
Interesting... differences between in Windows XP: SP2 vs. x64
x64 is light, sp2 dark (x64 was 100 points higher in overall score)
|
It die to the better memory management I got small but nice memory bandwith boost
between XP and X64
|
|
|
Jul 25, 2005, 01:13 AM
|
#13
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: norcal
Posts: 5,800
|
not sure what you mean by "better memory management ", but i am with you on mem bandwidth, can never have to much. to many people just do not figure it into fine tuning their comps or discount it completely. it does not mean to much most of the time, but the more load you put on your cpu & mem the more important it becomes.
|
|
|
|
|
|