|
| Notices |
DriverHeaven is currently recruiting for the AWOMO Beta Test / Elite Op Team. AWOMO is a digital download service for games, and we're looking to expand the beta team. If you're interested. Sign up as a member here at DriverHeaven and then head HERE to submit your details. Thanks
For more info on AWOMO visit their site HERE
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
Aug 22, 2004, 05:34 AM
|
#1
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 626
Rep Power: 0
|
More mem and new cpu or...?
or wait because I'm planning on buying a new pc within a year. And spend the extra money on that. I was thinking about buying an extra 512MB pc2700 kingston hyperX cas2,2,2,5,T1 and a xp3000+ for about €230. I still want to use this pc for network gaming after I buy the new pc. I don't want to buy corsair because they changed their latencies to 2,3,3,6 for the pc2700 XMS 512MD modules.
|
|
|
Aug 22, 2004, 05:37 AM
|
#2
|
|
MC John-117
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 0
|
Save it, that PC should be able to run any game that's coming out within a year or so. I don't see any games using that much pc power, but who knows.
|
|
|
Aug 22, 2004, 11:52 AM
|
#3
|
|
I = Greatest Dood
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: PuNk
Posts: 5,854
Rep Power: 42
|
but if you do upgrade get pc3200 ram as its not that much more and can overclock higher
|
|
|
Aug 22, 2004, 12:04 PM
|
#4
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 626
Rep Power: 0
|
But my other ram is pc2700 and I don't want to change that too. So pc3200 and pc2700 together is useless, overclocking wise. But you all wouldn't recommend upgrading to 1GB of ram and a xp3000+?
|
|
|
Aug 22, 2004, 02:45 PM
|
#5
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,940
Rep Power: 40

|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bart1987
But my other ram is pc2700 and I don't want to change that too. So pc3200 and pc2700 together is useless, overclocking wise. But you all wouldn't recommend upgrading to 1GB of ram and a xp3000+?
|
Not if you're buying another PC within a year.
|
|
|
Aug 22, 2004, 02:51 PM
|
#6
|
|
I = Greatest Dood
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: PuNk
Posts: 5,854
Rep Power: 42
|
might as well get 2x 512 of pc3200 and run dual channel fun
|
|
|
Aug 22, 2004, 02:56 PM
|
#7
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,523
Rep Power: 59

|
Hmm hard choice there. I would have to say no to the processor. Right now you're running a 2400 /w a 266FSB which is fast enough. However, if you purchase more PC2700 the processor you'll be eventually getting will at least support PC3200 or DDRII for that matter. Are you planning on building an entirely new computer in a year or just upgrade? I think that is the question that begs to be asked.
|
|
|
Aug 22, 2004, 02:57 PM
|
#8
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 626
Rep Power: 0
|
I'm planning on building a whole new PC. But I want to be able to use this PC for network gaming, because the other PC's in the network are to slow.
|
|
|
Aug 22, 2004, 05:47 PM
|
#9
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,523
Rep Power: 59

|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bart1987
I'm planning on building a whole new PC. But I want to be able to use this PC for network gaming, because the other PC's in the network are to slow.
|
Hmm well you're not going to notice too much difference between the 2400 vs the 3000. However, more ram definitely would be noticeable. You would have to upgrade to a processor /w a 400MHz FSB to really notice the improvement though than besides just more ram.
|
|
|
Aug 24, 2004, 07:37 AM
|
#10
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 626
Rep Power: 0
|
Okay. What would be a big difference in more ram? less stuttering in games? Or only faster loading times?
|
|
|
Aug 24, 2004, 08:55 AM
|
#11
|
|
I = Greatest Dood
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: PuNk
Posts: 5,854
Rep Power: 42
|
More ram will decrease laggyness, increased loading times of aplications. The ability to have a few extra aplications open example: A game, 2 internet explorere and msn messanger and just sitting there with no problem. Everything with more ram seems to run extremely smoother. Its sad to see your pc2700 (166 ) is at 133  . processory fsb kinda bites, when upgraded to 400 you can notice a huge difference.
|
|
|
Aug 24, 2004, 10:52 AM
|
#12
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 626
Rep Power: 0
|
Well, I've got my cpu running at 169x12,5@1,65V
And my mem at 169Mhz Cas 2,2,2,5.
This was the highest I could clock it. If I tried to put it at 13x it would run at 5x instead of 13x. Might have to do with the stock voltage. But I don't want to increase it because my cpu already runs at 47degreed Celsius on 100% load. Would it be better to get more ram from corsair XMS eventhough that is timed 166@2,3,3,6 or get kingston hyperX 166@2,2,2,5 .
|
|
|
Aug 24, 2004, 06:58 PM
|
#13
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,523
Rep Power: 59

|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bart1987
Well, I've got my cpu running at 169x12,5@1,65V
And my mem at 169Mhz Cas 2,2,2,5.
This was the highest I could clock it. If I tried to put it at 13x it would run at 5x instead of 13x. Might have to do with the stock voltage. But I don't want to increase it because my cpu already runs at 47degreed Celsius on 100% load. Would it be better to get more ram from corsair XMS eventhough that is timed 166@2,3,3,6 or get kingston hyperX 166@2,2,2,5 .
|
The general rule is "You get what you already have". I would go with the Corsair.
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2004, 08:02 AM
|
#14
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 626
Rep Power: 0
|
Could there be compatibility problems when I use corsair with kingston? Why should you get waht you already have, eventhough it are different mem chips, working on different cas latencies.
|
|
|
|
|
|