• Home
  • Reviews
  • Articles
  • News
  • Tools
  • GamingHeaven
  • Forums
  • Network
 

Go Back   DriverHeaven.net > Forums > Hardware and Related Topics > Hardware Discussion & Support

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old Aug 22, 2004, 05:34 AM   #1
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 626
Rep Power: 0
Bart1987 is on a distinguished road

More mem and new cpu or...?

or wait because I'm planning on buying a new pc within a year. And spend the extra money on that. I was thinking about buying an extra 512MB pc2700 kingston hyperX cas2,2,2,5,T1 and a xp3000+ for about €230. I still want to use this pc for network gaming after I buy the new pc. I don't want to buy corsair because they changed their latencies to 2,3,3,6 for the pc2700 XMS 512MD modules.
Bart1987 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old Aug 22, 2004, 05:37 AM   #2
MC John-117
 
TwistedMetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 0
TwistedMetal is on a distinguished road

Save it, that PC should be able to run any game that's coming out within a year or so. I don't see any games using that much pc power, but who knows.
TwistedMetal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2004, 11:52 AM   #3
I = Greatest Dood
 
GutterPunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: PuNk
Posts: 5,854
Rep Power: 42
GutterPunk will become famous soon enough

but if you do upgrade get pc3200 ram as its not that much more and can overclock higher
GutterPunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2004, 12:04 PM   #4
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 626
Rep Power: 0
Bart1987 is on a distinguished road

But my other ram is pc2700 and I don't want to change that too. So pc3200 and pc2700 together is useless, overclocking wise. But you all wouldn't recommend upgrading to 1GB of ram and a xp3000+?
Bart1987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2004, 02:45 PM   #5
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,940
Rep Power: 40
Zelig will become famous soon enoughZelig will become famous soon enough
System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart1987
But my other ram is pc2700 and I don't want to change that too. So pc3200 and pc2700 together is useless, overclocking wise. But you all wouldn't recommend upgrading to 1GB of ram and a xp3000+?
Not if you're buying another PC within a year.
Zelig is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2004, 02:51 PM   #6
I = Greatest Dood
 
GutterPunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: PuNk
Posts: 5,854
Rep Power: 42
GutterPunk will become famous soon enough

might as well get 2x 512 of pc3200 and run dual channel fun
GutterPunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2004, 02:56 PM   #7
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
 
Necrosis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,523
Rep Power: 59
Necrosis has a spectacular aura aboutNecrosis has a spectacular aura about
System Specs

Hmm hard choice there. I would have to say no to the processor. Right now you're running a 2400 /w a 266FSB which is fast enough. However, if you purchase more PC2700 the processor you'll be eventually getting will at least support PC3200 or DDRII for that matter. Are you planning on building an entirely new computer in a year or just upgrade? I think that is the question that begs to be asked.
Necrosis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2004, 02:57 PM   #8
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 626
Rep Power: 0
Bart1987 is on a distinguished road

I'm planning on building a whole new PC. But I want to be able to use this PC for network gaming, because the other PC's in the network are to slow.
Bart1987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2004, 05:47 PM   #9
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
 
Necrosis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,523
Rep Power: 59
Necrosis has a spectacular aura aboutNecrosis has a spectacular aura about
System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart1987
I'm planning on building a whole new PC. But I want to be able to use this PC for network gaming, because the other PC's in the network are to slow.
Hmm well you're not going to notice too much difference between the 2400 vs the 3000. However, more ram definitely would be noticeable. You would have to upgrade to a processor /w a 400MHz FSB to really notice the improvement though than besides just more ram.
Necrosis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2004, 07:37 AM   #10
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 626
Rep Power: 0
Bart1987 is on a distinguished road

Okay. What would be a big difference in more ram? less stuttering in games? Or only faster loading times?
Bart1987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2004, 08:55 AM   #11
I = Greatest Dood
 
GutterPunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: PuNk
Posts: 5,854
Rep Power: 42
GutterPunk will become famous soon enough

More ram will decrease laggyness, increased loading times of aplications. The ability to have a few extra aplications open example: A game, 2 internet explorere and msn messanger and just sitting there with no problem. Everything with more ram seems to run extremely smoother. Its sad to see your pc2700 (166 ) is at 133 . processory fsb kinda bites, when upgraded to 400 you can notice a huge difference.
GutterPunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2004, 10:52 AM   #12
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 626
Rep Power: 0
Bart1987 is on a distinguished road

Well, I've got my cpu running at 169x12,5@1,65V
And my mem at 169Mhz Cas 2,2,2,5.
This was the highest I could clock it. If I tried to put it at 13x it would run at 5x instead of 13x. Might have to do with the stock voltage. But I don't want to increase it because my cpu already runs at 47degreed Celsius on 100% load. Would it be better to get more ram from corsair XMS eventhough that is timed 166@2,3,3,6 or get kingston hyperX 166@2,2,2,5 .
Bart1987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2004, 06:58 PM   #13
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
 
Necrosis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,523
Rep Power: 59
Necrosis has a spectacular aura aboutNecrosis has a spectacular aura about
System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart1987
Well, I've got my cpu running at 169x12,5@1,65V
And my mem at 169Mhz Cas 2,2,2,5.
This was the highest I could clock it. If I tried to put it at 13x it would run at 5x instead of 13x. Might have to do with the stock voltage. But I don't want to increase it because my cpu already runs at 47degreed Celsius on 100% load. Would it be better to get more ram from corsair XMS eventhough that is timed 166@2,3,3,6 or get kingston hyperX 166@2,2,2,5 .
The general rule is "You get what you already have". I would go with the Corsair.
Necrosis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 26, 2004, 08:02 AM   #14
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 626
Rep Power: 0
Bart1987 is on a distinguished road

Could there be compatibility problems when I use corsair with kingston? Why should you get waht you already have, eventhough it are different mem chips, working on different cas latencies.
Bart1987 is offline   Reply With Quote
 

 
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin implementation by Craig '5320' Humphreys

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 PM. Copyright ©2008 HeavenMedia.net