|
|||||||
| Notices |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
Nov 3, 2003, 12:19 PM
|
#2 |
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
|
Not too shabby!!
|
|
|
|
Nov 3, 2003, 12:25 PM
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,108
Rep Power: 0
|
Still early, but for a $400 card (expected price) not to impressive IMHO
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 3, 2003, 04:12 PM
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gurnee Illinois
Posts: 4,677
Rep Power: 0
|
I was just gonna post these... Damnit. grrrr
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 3, 2003, 04:29 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Avril Fan
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: somewhere in colombia, okok, bogotá city :p
Posts: 1,252
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
so expensive... I thought this were going to be better for that price, or cheaper for the performance ^^' |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 10, 2003, 04:36 PM
|
#6 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
|
Its early yet they still have over two months till relese?
remeber how shabby the 9500 was on alpha drivers and board? and looked how that turned out, i for one am looking forward to this new company's board |
|
|
|
|
Nov 10, 2003, 05:46 PM
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,108
Rep Power: 0
|
Tested without AA or AF, so - ~30/40% so that leaves?..........
yeah yeah, I know: beta but still have to say i'm not impressed.. |
|
|
|
|
Nov 14, 2003, 12:18 AM
|
#8 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
|
well seeing as how this is a first release....and an extremely beta version of the card and its drivers there is only room for improvement. not to sure about that 4x max aa and af though. hopefully that is fixed. especially considering this is a dual gpu card.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 14, 2003, 12:29 AM
|
#9 |
|
i am rad.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: central pa
Posts: 236
Rep Power: 0
|
those scores arent bad at all considering its a beta release. there is still much room for improvement, and i belive the cost of these boards is going to be significantly less than those of ati, or nvidia. (i think i read that from tomshardware.com, somewhere)
|
|
|
|
