Is it just me or is some of the XFX GX2 (single) review inconsistent with the results from the Quad review?
http://www.driverheaven.net/reviews....d=538&pageid=1
http://www.driverheaven.net/reviews....d=541&pageid=1
Primarily in the Oblivion benchmarks as other benchmarks were using different settings from one article to the other. As far as I can tell the test systems are basically the same.
i.e. Single XFX GX2 Review. Oblivion "The resolution was 1920x1200 and 4x anti-aliasing was applied. Anisotropic filtering was set to 16x and HDR enabled"
Average FPS 93.
Single XFX GX2 in the Quad SLi review. "The resolution was 1920x1200 and 8x anti-aliasing was applied. Anisotropic filtering was set to 16x and HDR enabled."
Average FPS 49 with the Quad solution having an average of 66.
Am I missing something here (entirely possible)?
Considering these articles were created only days apart.
Perhaps the ESA box slowed it down.