|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
|
Apr 16, 2008, 02:24 PM
|
#1
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 29
|
What should I get...Crysis or Bioshock?
Just got my pc together....
x2 4800+, 8800gts (320mb), 2gb DDR2 800 (pc6400)
Playing at 1440x900
I know it's not high-end but how do you think these games will run on my pc and what do you think is the better game?
Last edited by Grackus; Apr 16, 2008 at 02:29 PM.
|
|
|
Apr 16, 2008, 02:39 PM
|
#2
|
|
DH SuperMod
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: By the light of lamp I sit and type...
Posts: 15,760
|
They will both run fine.
Personally, I'd go with Bioshock, it's the better of the two. Crysis isn't bad, but it's no where near as good as Bioshock, imo.
|
|
|
Apr 16, 2008, 02:42 PM
|
#3
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: MI, US
Posts: 552
|
Bioshock sucked.
Crysis is just all around fun.
Play Bioshock (initals are BS, makes sense :P) if you like a good story, tons of repetitive bosses, and boring game play.
Play Crysis if you like replayability, great strategy chances, and an all around great game.
|
|
|
Apr 16, 2008, 02:54 PM
|
#4
|
|
In Fedor We Trust
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ottawa , Canada
Posts: 3,852
|
I've basically got the same system as you and would recommend Bioshock over Crysis. They're both great games but Bioshock is more of an enjoyable experience and won't leave you cursing your video card for not being powerful enough to maintain a smooth framerate.
It might be unfathomable for some people to do but Crysis is a game that might be better to put on the shelf for a year or two then come back to once the video cards available decimate it. A lot of people did this with Far Cry and I'm sure they enjoyed the game in its full glory rather than on lower visual quality settings.
|
|
|
Apr 16, 2008, 02:59 PM
|
#5
|
|
DH's Asteroids' Dominator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK and Hellas, mostly
Posts: 4,922
|
Though I hate to say it, Bioshock is a very good game. Crysis is an average game with very good graphics. Take your pick.
|
|
|
Apr 16, 2008, 03:14 PM
|
#6
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmegaRED
I've basically got the same system as you and would recommend Bioshock over Crysis. They're both great games but Bioshock is more of an enjoyable experience and won't leave you cursing your video card for not being powerful enough to maintain a smooth framerate.
It might be unfathomable for some people to do but Crysis is a game that might be better to put on the shelf for a year or two then come back to once the video cards available decimate it. A lot of people did this with Far Cry and I'm sure they enjoyed the game in its full glory rather than on lower visual quality settings.
|
I kind of thought about that. Maybe waiting a while...next year or so after I do my next update.
I played a Bioshock demo on my 360 but it seemed like a game better played on pc.
I'm really in the mood for a new Thief game...those were the days I tell ya!!
|
|
|
Apr 16, 2008, 03:19 PM
|
#7
|
|
DH SuperMod
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: By the light of lamp I sit and type...
Posts: 15,760
|
Check out Assassins Creed if you get a chance, its pretty enjoyable.
|
|
|
Apr 17, 2008, 01:21 AM
|
#8
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Real captial of Canada: Toronto
Posts: 4,742
|
Bioshock gets my vote too. While Crysis looks great, is fun to play, if you are any good at FPS games you will beat it pretty damn quick. It took me a few days (pacing myself, couple hours a day), but a friend of mine went through it in a day. Bioshock, on the other hand, has so much atmosphere to it that you want to take it slow just so that you can soak it all in (the story, that is.. not the water). Bioshock, for me, was overall more enjoyable.
BTW, if you go with Bioshock, be sure to updated it to (Edit) 1.1 as there a couple extra plasmids in there that didn't make it into the final version of the game.
Last edited by Tipstaff; Apr 18, 2008 at 12:16 AM.
|
|
|
Apr 17, 2008, 03:41 AM
|
#9
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,347
|
i havent played crysis yet (not worth it on my current pc) but i will put in a good word for bioshock, supurb game imo.
|
|
|
Apr 17, 2008, 03:44 AM
|
#10
|
|
Burned
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 29,662
|
Bioshock. Ive beaten both and I thought crysis was a distinctly average game, much poorer than farcry really.
|
|
|
Apr 17, 2008, 05:54 AM
|
#11
|
|
Stingy and Stubborn
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,320
|
I say BioShock, though I've never played Crysis. I don't really plan on playing Crysis because I've heard it's not that great of a game, and.. well, it's made by EA 
|
|
|
Apr 17, 2008, 06:42 AM
|
#12
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boston, USA
Posts: 3,528
|
Bioshock without a doubt. Probably the best $30 you can spend on a game today 
|
|
|
Apr 17, 2008, 08:25 AM
|
#13
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 65
|
I have played both games. My opinion about the games:
Bioshock:
+ good and interesting story-line;
+ great atmosphere;
+ alot to explore and alot things to do, much like System Shock and Deus Ex;
+ nice graphics (but after seeing Crysis it becomes standard);
+ the game is pretty long (well, much longer than Crysis).
+ nice (gameplay) interaction between fire, ice, electricity and water
- the game is not that hard;
- game activation annoyance (require internet connection);
Crysis:
+ Superb graphics (after some tweaks it looks even better); very big environment;
+ plays alot like Far Cry (could be a disadvantage for people who didn't like Far Cry);
+ nice innovative nano suit/weapon/gun implementation;
+ controllable vehicles;
+ impressive physics implementation;
- High system requirements;
- The game is very short;
- could not use gun/weapons under water, just like Farcry;
- the suite is sometimes useless; specific "super power" depleting too fast; you die almost as fast as in Farcry while the latter the main character does not have a nano suite; hope for a patch for balancing the suite or adding upgradability of the suite;
I think Bioshock is a better game and have a more polished gameplay (not that Crysis is a bad game) and in your case Bioshock will run very smooth on your system while Crysis could run just okay with some settings mostly on mid and some on high (the shader option which makes the game look much better than on mid) with probably 20-30 fps. Latter levels in the game the framerates will be even lower.
|
|
|
Apr 17, 2008, 10:10 AM
|
#14
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 1,268
|
Bioshock was a game that made time disappear for me, it kept my interest and made me want to keep playing. Crysis made me wonder what all the hype was about and I played it just to be done with it.
|
|
|
Apr 17, 2008, 11:33 AM
|
#15
|
|
DH News MOD
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Nottingham,UK
Posts: 32,661
|
Bioshock for sure  I can't offer any more than what has already been said in the replies above.My usual is to play it on easy to get to know the game,then crank up the difficulty level for the replay...it gives me a advantage in some ways.
Crysis is good but is perhaps a little repetitive,to me this shortens the replay value....May be better if you can get a used copy or wait till it drops in price.
|
|
|
Apr 17, 2008, 01:23 PM
|
#16
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 5,220
|
i played both and thought both sucked, although bioshock sucked less then crysis did, so i guess go with bioshock.
|
|
|
Apr 17, 2008, 05:56 PM
|
#17
|
|
DH's Asteroids' Dominator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK and Hellas, mostly
Posts: 4,922
|
BTW, why don't you buy Rainbow Six Vegas? The first one must be very cheap now.
|
|
|
Apr 17, 2008, 06:15 PM
|
#18
|
|
DH SuperMod
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: By the light of lamp I sit and type...
Posts: 15,760
|
Another game (which I can't believe hasn't been mentioned) is Call of Duty 4. It's definetly my favorite game of 2007, and the only one I still play. If you haven't checked that out, you are seriously missing out.
|
|
|
Apr 17, 2008, 06:56 PM
|
#19
|
|
-DH Resident Uber Poster-
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Riverside, CA (right next to the f*ckin train)
Posts: 6,625
|
Bioshock doesn't have multiplayer Crysis does.
They both were pretty forgetable to me but I still play Crysis for the multiplayer.
I say Resident Evil 4.
|
|
|
Apr 17, 2008, 09:46 PM
|
#20
|
|
DH's Youngest Mod
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,825
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFOSOK
I say Resident Evil 4.
|
LOL 
|
|
|
Apr 18, 2008, 05:33 AM
|
#21
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,284
|
Bioshock....no competition!
|
|
|
Apr 18, 2008, 11:25 AM
|
#22
|
|
Epic Phail at Lief
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vikingod
Another game (which I can't believe hasn't been mentioned) is Call of Duty 4. It's definetly my favorite game of 2007, and the only one I still play. If you haven't checked that out, you are seriously missing out.
|
Agreed, it's a fantastic game that rarely (not never) gets boring 
I'd probably go with Bioshock over Crysis, Crysis feels more like a game where you arse around than progress through a story if you ask me, a sandbox mode would be cool 
|
|
|
Apr 18, 2008, 11:51 AM
|
#23
|
|
DH News MOD
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Nottingham,UK
Posts: 32,661
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vikingod
Another game (which I can't believe hasn't been mentioned) is Call of Duty 4. It's definetly my favorite game of 2007, and the only one I still play. If you haven't checked that out, you are seriously missing out.
|
I considered mentioning cod 4.... As it is a top notch game i found the single player side way too short.
I have no idea what the online side is like,as i have no interest in online gameplay.
Its a good alternative game.
|
|
|
Apr 19, 2008, 08:43 AM
|
#24
|
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Posts: 135
|
Online is where COD4 really comes into it's own. The single player game is short but very sweet, i'd definitely reccommend COD4 above both Bioshock and Crysis.
|
|
|
Apr 21, 2008, 02:49 AM
|
#25
|
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: BOTSWANA
Posts: 178
|
I think Bioshock is a better game coz it doesn’t totally kill your system. But for the | |