• Home
  • Reviews
  • Articles
  • News
  • Tools
  • GamingHeaven
  • Forums
  • Network
 

Go Back   DriverHeaven.net > Forums > News > DH News > DH Reviews

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old Nov 9, 2007, 10:28 AM   #1
Burned
 
Zardon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 29,663
Zardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his status

DH Review: Auzentech X-Fi Prelude 7.1 and ASUS Xonar D2

Read The Review Here
_______________________________

CPU's and graphics cards are always prime candidates for discussion when building an enthusiast system. Rarely does anyone give soundcards a thought, even though aural pleasure should be as much a requirement as the ultimate eye candy.

In the last few years things have been pretty stale with Creative having a clear lead due to their Soundblaster Live! and Audigy cards. It was only recently that things got interesting again, with Creative’s new X-Fi line bringing new cards to the table, as well as several other companies’ proprietary solutions. Today we’ll be looking at Auzen’s take on an X-Fi soundcard and a 7.1 channel soundcard from ASUS which places special emphasis on Dolby and DTS support.
Zardon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 9, 2007, 12:09 PM   #2
The quest continues
 
Chaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,432
Chaos is on a distinguished road
System Specs

nice review, overall i guess the Auzentech card was the better choice overall. How much superior to onboard HD audio do you think the cards offer. Would a 2.1 Klipsch Pro Media setup see much benifit over onboard HD audio
Chaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 9, 2007, 08:38 PM   #3
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: around
Posts: 792
bug77 is on a distinguished road

Z is going to 'love' me for this, but this is one of the weaker DH reviews.

1. Genius speakers to evaluate the performance of sound cards with 120db SNR?
2. No reason not to use EAX5.0 in games when the only perceptible difference is a loss in performance? Then again, this may be related to #1.
3. Not recommending the Prelude to audiophiles because of lack of DD/DTS? How many audiophiles have their music encoded in more than stereo?

Looks like a rushed review to me.
bug77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 2007, 04:17 AM   #4
The Knows Mister
 
WhO_KnOwS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Slovenia, Europe
Posts: 392
WhO_KnOwS has a spectacular aura aboutWhO_KnOwS has a spectacular aura aboutWhO_KnOwS has a spectacular aura about

Quote:
Originally Posted by bug77 View Post
Z is going to 'love' me for this, but this is one of the weaker DH reviews.

1. Genius speakers to evaluate the performance of sound cards with 120db SNR?
2. No reason not to use EAX5.0 in games when the only perceptible difference is a loss in performance? Then again, this may be related to #1.
3. Not recommending the Prelude to audiophiles because of lack of DD/DTS? How many audiophiles have their music encoded in more than stereo?

Looks like a rushed review to me.
1. The Genius speakers were only used to judge how the cards would sound on an average 5.1 system. If you haven't noticed it was a Creative 7.1 set that was used as a primary surround test setup.
2. Using EAX5.0 over no EAX technology whatsoever - yeah, you'll hear a huge difference. Using it over previous EAX versions however and the difference ain't that huge. It is noticable, don't get me wrong, but it's not revolutionary.
3. True, the sound is encoded in stereo. But believe it or not many audiophiles have surround systems (admitably the front speakers are usually high end stereo speakers). And in cases like this you'll want more than just cloned channels all around you. My father is a professional cello player and as big an audiophile as you can find (hence the vinyl recording comparisons and the high end stereo speakers used). And we both agree that on a surround system the DTS/DD technology used to upsample the signal produced better sounding results than simple channel clonning.
WhO_KnOwS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 2007, 08:19 AM   #5
Burned
 
Zardon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 29,663
Zardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his status

Quote:
Originally Posted by bug77 View Post
Z is going to 'love' me for this, but this is one of the weaker DH reviews..
Oh not at all. I don't publish weak reviews - weak reviews get binned or re written - ive been an audiophile myself for 20 years and spent close to 50,000 on high end components so in my view as Editor in chief this review is well written for the target audience on DH. Would I have altered parts if we were a audiophile website? certainly. but true purist audiophiles, don't use "sound cards", digital audio or compressed formats and even a computer in the mix anyway so the comments are moot.

Peter answered your questions quite well, hopefully you are educated on the subject a little more now. I do however strongly suggest you read the reviews a little more thoroughly in future (after all you seemingly missed the Sonus Faber Domus speakers and Primare 121 Amplifier used as high end partners), seems your review complaints lately are somewhat clutching at straws.
Zardon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 12, 2007, 02:10 AM   #6
Back in London
 
germanjulian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 1,794
germanjulian is on a distinguished road

happy with my asus
germanjulian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2007, 11:15 PM   #7
Official Cyberpunk ^_-
 
Shike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 895
Shike is on a distinguished road

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zardon View Post
. . . but true purist audiophiles, don't use "sound cards", digital audio or compressed formats and even a computer in the mix anyway so the comments are moot.
I beg to differ, with DVD-A slowly but surely dominating SACD and the selection growing, there's little reason to go back to vinyl. And if that were the case, who would give a crap about soundcard quality anyway? Why even attempt to review either card with audiophiles in mind? I'm not trying to be rude but it seems pretty contradictory to me.

Even more so, using a PC as a music server is becoming more appealing. Heck, consider some of the digital media streaming devices aimed at audiophiles and you should see what a gross generalization you've made.

You can get the ever sweet taste in your mouth just by looking at the products found on the FLAC website.

There's also no measurement of the impact changing the OPAMPs may present. The "warm sound" the Asus brings to the table may just be a whole $12-20 difference.

Lastly, I have to agree that most audiophiles aren't going to bother with DD or DTS.

You may think bug77's cristisms lack weight or warrant, but there's some glaring flaws IMO too.

In other news, I already have a Prelude on the way regardless. Can't wait for it to show.
Shike is offline   Reply With Quote
 

 
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Artwork by Allan 'Zardon' Campbell, vBulletin implementation by Craig '5320' Humphreys based on original artwork by Ratchet.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 AM. Copyright ©2008 HeavenMedia.net