• Home
  • Reviews
  • Articles
  • News
  • Tools
  • GamingHeaven
  • Forums
  • Network
 

Go Back   DriverHeaven.net > Forums > Hardware and Related Topics > Overclocking and Modding

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old Aug 16, 2007, 04:09 AM   #1
C47
DriverHeaven Lover
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 188
C47 is on a distinguished road

Dual core temperatures

I have a dual core cpu, and i get three readings from nxsensor; processor,core A, core B
when overclocking should i consider the processor reading?
during encoding these are the results
(proc,core A, core B)
PC Wizard 2007 : 49,50,55
nextsensor : 40.49,55
coretemeter : --.56.48
#1 : notice that nxsensor, pc wizard readings for both cores are both reversed when compared to coretemeter
#2 : proc temp in pc wizard is higher than nxsensor (either way it is lower that both cores)
so what reading does the processor correspond to (the processor die?)....and what significance does it have if overclocking

-----
another issue is that when idle there is a 10C difference between the two core....can someone explain why this is the case
C47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2007, 12:24 AM   #2
Me>You
 
Da_Jewish_Fonzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Da Hood
Posts: 507
Da_Jewish_Fonzy needs some serious mental readjustingDa_Jewish_Fonzy needs some serious mental readjustingDa_Jewish_Fonzy needs some serious mental readjustingDa_Jewish_Fonzy needs some serious mental readjustingDa_Jewish_Fonzy needs some serious mental readjustingDa_Jewish_Fonzy needs some serious mental readjusting

Quote:
Originally Posted by C47 View Post
I have a dual core cpu, and i get three readings from nxsensor; processor,core A, core B
when overclocking should i consider the processor reading?
during encoding these are the results
(proc,core A, core B)
PC Wizard 2007 : 49,50,55
nextsensor : 40.49,55
coretemeter : --.56.48
#1 : notice that nxsensor, pc wizard readings for both cores are both reversed when compared to coretemeter
#2 : proc temp in pc wizard is higher than nxsensor (either way it is lower that both cores)
so what reading does the processor correspond to (the processor die?)....and what significance does it have if overclocking

-----
another issue is that when idle there is a 10C difference between the two core....can someone explain why this is the case
I can answer one question, sort of, its normal for the two cores to be around 7 degrees different in temp with X2's from my expirience and also the expirience of others I've encountered on various forums, so don't worry.

As far as what temp to worry about, just pay attention to the core temps, most people follow the rule of thumb of no higher than 55 degrees core temp on X2's give or take, 57 or even 60 on one core won't kill your cpu but its best for longevity to keep them 55ish or under.

A good app that I like for monitoring temps is coretemp:

Core Temp

Its fairly popular and I've ccompared it to Everest Ultimate and it seems to also be pretty accurate or inline with the same temps.
Da_Jewish_Fonzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 25, 2007, 11:14 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,966
PangingJr has a spectacular aura aboutPangingJr has a spectacular aura aboutPangingJr has a spectacular aura about

good to read a very good comment and one that does not scare me away like that from you Da_Jewish_Hornet.
i just though i should tell you.

as for the op's post, what is your motherboard and processor type?
PangingJr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2007, 11:54 PM   #4
Noise? What noise?
 
H3X4D3C1M4L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,797
H3X4D3C1M4L will become famous soon enough
System Specs

Two cores shouldn't be that far apart since they're located directly on the same chip... I'd use Core Temp. I've found it to be a pretty reliable program with minimal system resource impact
H3X4D3C1M4L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 30, 2007, 01:42 AM   #5
4870X2 Anyone??
 
ChaosMinionX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 2,079
ChaosMinionX is a glorious beacon of lightChaosMinionX is a glorious beacon of lightChaosMinionX is a glorious beacon of lightChaosMinionX is a glorious beacon of lightChaosMinionX is a glorious beacon of lightChaosMinionX is a glorious beacon of light
System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by H3X4D3C1M4L View Post
Two cores shouldn't be that far apart since they're located directly on the same chip... I'd use Core Temp. I've found it to be a pretty reliable program with minimal system resource impact

Could be that far apart due to a number of things.... improper TIM application, uneven pressure across the IHS and heatsink base due to concave,convex surfaces on either IHS or base, or a misread by a faulty program.
ChaosMinionX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2007, 12:13 AM   #6
Noise? What noise?
 
H3X4D3C1M4L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,797
H3X4D3C1M4L will become famous soon enough
System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaosMinionX View Post
Could be that far apart due to a number of things.... improper TIM application, uneven pressure across the IHS and heatsink base due to concave,convex surfaces on either IHS or base, or a misread by a faulty program.
Yeah but 10 degrees? It hardly seems likely even if all that is true (except faulty program)
H3X4D3C1M4L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 16, 2007, 09:14 PM   #7
4870X2 Anyone??
 
ChaosMinionX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 2,079
ChaosMinionX is a glorious beacon of lightChaosMinionX is a glorious beacon of lightChaosMinionX is a glorious beacon of lightChaosMinionX is a glorious beacon of lightChaosMinionX is a glorious beacon of lightChaosMinionX is a glorious beacon of light
System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by H3X4D3C1M4L View Post
Yeah but 10 degrees? It hardly seems likely even if all that is true (except faulty program)

Its very possible actually Most quadcores average 5C difference across all 4 cores. 2-3 might be the same then 1 other is 5C higher or vice versa.
ChaosMinionX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 16, 2007, 11:24 PM   #8
mkk
Hezbollah supporter
 
mkk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gefle, Sweden
Posts: 3,156
mkk will become famous soon enoughmkk will become famous soon enough
System Specs

The sensors themselves aren't too accurate. There can be a large difference between the readout from the two cores simply because the sensors in each CPU deviate more or less in either direction from the actual temperature.
mkk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 17, 2007, 01:23 AM   #9
F.U.B.A.R.
 
CDsDontBurn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 18,957
CDsDontBurn has a spectacular aura aboutCDsDontBurn has a spectacular aura aboutCDsDontBurn has a spectacular aura about
System Specs

what about TAT, the Intel Thermal Analasys Tool? whatever happened to that?
CDsDontBurn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 17, 2007, 01:30 AM   #10
Howlin at the moon
 
Lelisevis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunderland, UK
Posts: 1,469
Lelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of light
System Specs

My Quadcore seem to run within 1-2C difference across the cores at 100% load, though when I initially put it together I was getting upto 6c variation as the thermal paste hadnt spread very well.
Lelisevis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 17, 2007, 02:25 PM   #11
4870X2 Anyone??
 
ChaosMinionX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 2,079
ChaosMinionX is a glorious beacon of lightChaosMinionX is a glorious beacon of lightChaosMinionX is a glorious beacon of lightChaosMinionX is a glorious beacon of lightChaosMinionX is a glorious beacon of lightChaosMinionX is a glorious beacon of light
System Specs

Thats a warm little B3 you got there
ChaosMinionX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 17, 2007, 02:36 PM   #12
Howlin at the moon
 
Lelisevis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunderland, UK
Posts: 1,469
Lelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of light
System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaosMinionX View Post
Thats a warm little B3 you got there
Heh weathers pretty warm here at the moment and it's at 1.35v, never tops 60c though so plenty of playing room left. Oh and that AS5 was applied fresh that day so hasn't really bedded in. I'll give it a couple of weeks and bump it to 1.4v and 3ghz. Dont forget I got two 8800GTS cards in their and a stupid Asus chipset system which gets so hot I can't touch it.
Lelisevis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 04:24 AM   #13
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,966
PangingJr has a spectacular aura aboutPangingJr has a spectacular aura aboutPangingJr has a spectacular aura about

nah i think the processor temps looks pretty okay to me, specially considering the system was in a warm environment.
PangingJr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 03:17 PM   #14
Howlin at the moon
 
Lelisevis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunderland, UK
Posts: 1,469
Lelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of light
System Specs

What a difference a few days of stress testing and burning in can make. Room temps still similar but im now idling at 36-37C. One degree difference on core1 is NWN2 updating. On top of that I have 3 messenger windows and 4 websites on the taskbar so it's not strictly idling.
Just goes to show that correctly applying thermal paste can make all the difference.
Lelisevis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 19, 2007, 01:58 AM   #15
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,966
PangingJr has a spectacular aura aboutPangingJr has a spectacular aura aboutPangingJr has a spectacular aura about

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lelisevis View Post
What a difference a few days of stress testing and burning in can make. Room temps still similar but im now idling at 36-37C. One degree difference on core1 is NWN2 updating. On top of that I have 3 messenger windows and 4 websites on the taskbar so it's not strictly idling.
Just goes to show that correctly applying thermal paste can make all the difference.
that Core temp also shows you need to burn in the processor some more (j/k).
actually, the temperature looks pretty good.



and i think 1-2 and up to 5 degrees celsius different between or among each core during system "idling" should not be much concerned to user.
however, when the system processor in "full load", the difference between each CPU core's should not be, at all time, more than 2°C.

and besides the CPU cooler, computer case air flow, (and just you might add the thermal compound to this), as you can notice, the room temps can/will make the big different on the system's and processor's temps. different room temps, different system temps.

PangingJr is offline   Reply With Quote
 

 
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Artwork by Allan 'Zardon' Campbell, vBulletin implementation by Craig '5320' Humphreys based on original artwork by Ratchet.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 PM. Copyright ©2008 HeavenMedia.net