HMMMMMM....
Looking at the style and content of the OP I'm thinking that this is BTK #3
BTK #1 = Good, original flames, decent use of profanify, and the English language. He was here about 2 years ago, and was quit fun to read.
BTK #2 = Pathetic lamer, not flamer. Poor content, and pretty much limited to 'You're a fag, No, you're a fag' type posts. Rarely worth reading, and only to see if anyone else in the thread had anything decent to say.
BTK #3 = So far, 1/2 way decent at flaming. Much better than #2, but nowhere near the quality of #1. Remains to be seen if he's worthy of interest and/or gets better at flaming.