The hole in the ozone layer is something totally different...
Anyways.
"The problem I have is that opposing scientific theories are just that - hypothesis".
They're all theories.. agreed. But this documetary presents theory based on data collected and events from the past, so not an hypothesis - there is no "if"-case. Globalwarming theory is trying to predict future by using "if"-case hypothesis base on 30 years data..
Does all the "if" make sense?
Even a Greenpeace co-founder has had it (and left GP), due to politics taking over.. there has got to be something wrong right?
You'd rather spend billions of dollars than take a chance? Money dont just come from nothing.. so is it meaningful to spend them or is it waste?
Remember all the asteroid hype around year 2000? Deep impact, armageddon.. I'm kinda glad the world didnt waste money on a misile-shield... <- it sounds stupid right, but imagine year 2000, it wouldnt have been all that dumb back then.