Almost all of the parts I need to repair the son's computer came today 'cept the mobo which is due on Friday...so I have until then to decide between my current Silura GF2 MX400 and this new Visiontech GF2 GTS-V. The MX400 is modded-out ugly but runs at a fairly respectable 240/420 and benches about 3050 in 3dm2k1se. I just threw the GTS-V in "as-is" to test it and it came at 175/286.4 and scored 3013 in 3dm2k1se. I overclocked her to 200/300, got 3149; 210/343, got 3349; 219/357, got 3408 but also had some artifacting (mostly snow in "Lobby", but some flashes too.) so I backed her down to 200/300 and she made it thru 10 loops no sweat.
With no modding. No fins on the memory and just this cheasy fan/sink combo on the GPU.
Now my question is this...
I got all my OC numbers from RivaTuner 2.0 rc10. With my MX400 it says that the maximum clock on the chip is 240 & memory it's 420...on the GTS-V it says the chip is 220 and the memory only went up to around 360 and, well, frankly...
I don't get it. How come the MX400 can clock it's CPU higher? Memory I could understand, but I thought all GF2's used the same CPU?!?
Could someone help out a born again newbie who's confused? I'm trying to decide if adding some monster cooling to this new card is going to make a whole lot of difference or not...it already seems to OC pretty good with nothing, can I go beyond RivaTuners recomendations with additional cooling or will I just be wasting my time?
Thanks in advance!